Evidence of Khula and Pakistan Triple Talaq Law:
If you wish to know the process of evidence in khula procedure in Pakistan or Pakistan triple talaq law, you may contact Jamila Law Associates. No evidence is available that the deceased pronounced “Talaq-e-Bain,” and defendant witnesses for khula procedure in Pakistan or Pakistan triple talaq law did not depose that the deceased had pronounced irrevocable divorce or the same was pronounced thrice in one sitting. For Talaq in Pakistan, U need to Prpeare the Talaq Format in Pakistan after Know The Talaq procedure in Pakistan & Procedure of Talaq in Pakistan
it tendered the plaintiff producing a copy of the letter of withdrawal of notice of divorce by the deceased, and the same in evidence. Such a letter proved that the deceased did not pronounce Talaq-e-Bainas he revoked it before Arbitration Council within 90 days. Plaintiff held admittedly married with deceased and living with him as his wife.’ Issuance of notice of divorce to the Chairman Arbitration Council is not mandatory.
Divorce would become effective after the expiry of ninety days from the date of its pronouncement and not from the date of issuance of notice of such divorce to the chairman Arbitration Council for khula procedure in Pakistan or Pakistan triple talaq law. In the present case, the husband pronounced divorce to the wife on 18.03.2013, and the period of Iddat of ninety days expired on 17.06.2013. Divorce became irremovable on 20.06.2013 when a notice for withdrawal of same was issued.it directed Chairman Arbitration Council to issue a divorce certificate to the wife immediately.
A divorce deed was an agreement based upon the parties’ consent, and they signed it in the same presence of witnesses. Husband had also informed Chairman Union Council about khula procedure in Pakistan or Pakistan triple talaq law. Question of fact decided by a competent Court not subject to review in a writ petition.
Khula Procedure in Pakistan:
Regarding the khula procedure in Pakistan or Pakistan triple talaq law the mere fact that the High Court might have taken a different view based on evidence on record and view of Courts below was erroneous does base on the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction. The Tribunal competent has the power to decide a list rightly or wrongly so long as such decision is not perverse or contrary to the evidence on record or is not based on a misreading of the evidence. Family Curt sole Tribunal to decide the issue of fact based on the evidence produced before it.
High Court is based on jurisdiction not to disturb such finding of fact in case of khula procedure in Pakistan or Pakistan triple talaq law. Whether or not a reunion of possible spouse question to be decided by the Family Judge, and even if the decision is erroneous, it cannot be interfered with in writ jurisdiction. Tribunal having jurisdiction deciding erroneously cannot be said that such Tribunal acted illegally. High Court can interfere with the finding fact of a Family Court in the exercise of writ jurisdiction if it is based on a misreading of evidence or contrary to the evidence on record.
Dissolution of Marriage:
Family Court is granting decree for dissolution of marriage without adverting to reconciliation proceedings- It might be a serious irregularity given the mandatory nature of the provisions of S 10 and 12. Still, in a case in which the family Court has declined to grant decree for khula procedure in Pakistan or Pakistan triple talaq law, such an irregularity might not be so serious as to warrant to set aside the judgment of Family Court in the exercise of Constitutional jurisdiction. Written talaq.