Lifestyle

Pleadings and Procedure of Online Marriage in Pakistan

Procedure of Online Marriage in Pakistan

Pleadings and Procedure of Online Marriage in Pakistan:

To conduct the pleadings and procedure of online marriage in Pakistan or procedure of court marriage in Pakistan, you may contact Jamila Law Associates. A Civil Judge could be appointed as a Judge of the Family Court. District Judge could also empower any Civil Judge of First Class in the District to dispose of any proceedings transferred to him under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 after procedure of online marriage in Pakistan or procedure of court marriage in Pakistan.

Civil Judge:

Civil Judge, while exercising powers as a Guardian Judge, could also hear the family cases. It pointed out no Jurisdictional error, factual or legal infirmity in the impugned order passed by the District Judge. The constitutional petition was dismissed in limine. West Pakistan Family Courts Rules, 1965, R 6-Rule to be interpreted in a sense that aligns with the Act’s provisions. A conditional compromise was a one-time window for the Petitioner (father) to once and for all wriggle out of his responsibilities, particularly towards his minor daughter. Father could not shirk off his responsibilities towards the minor, and mother could not have agreed on her behalf allowing the father to do so.

Petitioner:

Even if a conditional compromise was to be followed or implemented, the Petitioner (father) could only blame himself for not making a requisite payment within the stipulated 03 months after procedure of online marriage in Pakistan or procedure of court marriage in Pakistan. Such a period was fixed with parties’ consent, and they knew well what they agreed to in terms of timeline. Parties could not wriggle out of the same more because the Family Courts Act, 1964, governed that matter. The constitutional petition was dismissed in Circumstances.

Procedure of Court Marriage:

Comments Question on procedure of online marriage in Pakistan or procedure of court marriage in Pakistan before High Court was whether Held, as far as the objection of the Petitioner regarding maintainability the objection and affidavit was concerned, though in cross-examination respondent had admitted she had not affixed thumb impression on the objection and affidavit. Still, in this regard, the language of R. 4 of Family Courts Rules, 1965, requiring the signing, verification, and presentation of the objection was identical to the provisions of Rr.14 & 15 of O. VI, C.P.C. Omission or irregularity in the signing and verification of the pleadings.

Presentation:

Presentation of the objection was rectifiable at a subsequent stage for procedure of online marriage in Pakistan or procedure of court marriage in Pakistan. Plaint could not be rejected, and a suit could not be dismissed for irregularities in performing certain acts. Omission or mistake to sign the pleadings was merely an irregularity and could be cured or rectified subsequently at any stage. So the courts’ findings below regarding the dower amount were by the law and procedure of online marriage in Pakistan or procedure of court marriage in Pakistan. Plaintiff, though, had failed to place any list or receipt of dowry articles on record.

Still, during cross-examination, the Petitioner had admitted certain dowry articles brought by the respondent at the time of procedure of online marriage in Pakistan or procedure of court marriage in Pakistan. Hence, the findings of the courts below were by the law. The respondent-wife alleged cruelty and urged that the defendant expel his house in her wear, and then, she resided with her parents. Two Witnesses fully supported the respondent’s statement; she, therefore, established the cruelty on the part of her husband.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
Translate »

Adblock Detected

Please unblock the ad blocker.