Opinion: Washington Post catches up with the dangers of self-driving cars

0
5


Even though I’m a news junkie, I try to disconnect on weekends. Still, last Sunday I had an hour to kill and a smartphone with me, so I browsed the headlines of our major newspapers.

I need a break from the endless discussions about the latest Supreme Court ruling – don’t be afraid, dear readers, because I’ll save my thoughts for a more appropriate place – I see Washington post Editorial Board thought about autonomous driving.

Here’s the title, for those too lazy to click it: “The problem with self-driving cars? Many people don’t drive themselves.

And paragraph lede: “The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration released a report this month on accidents involving vehicles with automated technology. Self-driving cars may not be the real problem — the problem is with those do not Drive yourself, but try to convince drivers that they do.

here, post office A deep dive into the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) report on self-driving accidents.

The editorial highlights two things that most automotive journalists have been yelling at on rooftops for five years (or more). First, the self-driving system is flawed. Second, drivers are sometimes too reliant on partially autonomous systems. I also appreciate the article, even if it slightly points out Tesla’s misleading use of the term “autopilot”.

A final reminder that while NHTSA is proposing regulations to improve the technology, drivers should remember that ultimately they should be in control.

Thank you Warburg.

I’m relieved that one of the country’s Big Four (New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, USA Today) the newspaper dedicates a portion of its opinion pages — and the importance of its editorial board, whatever* — to topics cherished in the minds of car enthusiasts and industry watchers alike. But it also affects almost everyone. But I’m also appalled – the general/mainstream media probably should have raised this question sooner.

*And this value may be determined by each reader, as some of us value editorial boards more than others, and may even vary by channel.

This is somewhat understandable – the automotive section of most newspapers has been largely eliminated due to a number of factors, much of which has to do with the fragile (and sometimes very stupid) economy of the media business. Once upon a time, your local newspaper had a car reviewer who wrote a weekly review and maybe some news/features – a reviewer who could educate readers on the subject. At least, a wire transfer service story can be picked up.

Right now, however, the mainstream media still seems to be a little slow to keep up with the auto industry unless they’re breaking news in the business section — or unless Elon Musk hasn’t done anything interesting yet.

To be fair, maybe not bad – I’ve seen a lot of media coverage on this topic in the mainstream media, like Wapo, at least the rumors. And it’s always possible that I’ve missed a similar point – I don’t have time to read all the articles on the subject. That said, it’s great to see people with influential platforms reminding the public that they need to drive carefully no matter what self-driving technology or advanced driver assistance (ADAS) their cars have.

TTAC has scope, but we don’t Wapo arrival.

I am not a Luddite. In principle, I’m not necessarily against autonomous driving or ADAS functionality. But I believe true self-driving — aka Level 5 — is still a long way off. I also believe that even in today’s cars full of features like automatic emergency braking systems and blind-spot monitoring warnings, the driver is ultimately in control.Self-driving technology and ADAS are useful in the right circumstances, but ultimately the driver must implement.

So it’s great to see mainstream media spreading the word.

I’m not as optimistic as the public get information. Just yesterday, I passed a driver on the Eisenhower Freeway who was driving too slowly and twisting. I thought he might be drunk, and while that’s certainly possible, I could tell as I moved around him that he was more focused on his phone than his tasks.

It’s going to be an uphill battle if we can’t get drivers to stop texting so they don’t rely too heavily on forward collision warnings.

However, the more media outlets with large platforms spread the responsibility message, the better.

[Image: Nicole Glass Photography/Shutterstock.com]

Become a TTAC insider.Get the latest information newFeatures, TTAC Needs, and All the Truth About Cars Subscribe to our communication.





Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here