© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Anti-abortion activists hold a cross outside the U.S. Supreme Court building during the annual March for Life in Washington, U.S., January 21, 2022. REUTERS/Jim Bourg/ file photo
(Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday announced another landmark ruling extending religious rights in support of a former Christian football coach at a Washington state public high school who was killed for refusing to stop praying with players on the field. Filed a lawsuit after being suspended. Pitch after the game.
In recent years, the court, especially its conservative group, has taken a broad view of religious freedom in many cases. Here are some of the cases involving religious rights that he has tried during his current term, which begins in October.
Kennedy v. Bremerton School District
In the case ruled on Monday, the court ruled 6-3 in favor of Joseph Kennedy, who worked as a part-time assistant football coach at Bremerton until 2015. The judge dismissed concerns from the local school district that in public schools, Kennedy’s prayers and Christian-laden speeches could be viewed as coercion of students or government endorsement of a particular religion, violating the so-called Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The judge overturned the lower court ruling in favor of the school district.
Carson v. Makin
In its June 3 decision on June 21, the court approved an increase in public funding for religious entities as it supports two Christian families challenging Maine’s tuition assistance program, which excludes private religious schools. The judge overturned a lower court ruling that rejected the families’ claims of religious discrimination that violated the U.S. Constitution, including First Amendment protections for the free exercise of religion. The Maine program provides public funding for tuition at private high schools of choice for families in sparsely populated areas without public high schools. Maine requires eligible schools to be “non-denominational,” excluding those that promote a particular religion and provide material “through the lens of that faith.”
SHURTLEFF v. Boston
The court ruled 9-0 on May 2 that Boston was allowing private groups in the event. in the square below. The judge ruled that the city violated its First Amendment right to free speech protected by the Christian group Camp and its director Harold Shurtleff. Boston has argued that raising the cross flag as part of a flag-raising program to promote diversity and tolerance in the city, as required by the camp’s constitution, may appear to violate another part of the First Amendment that prohibits the government from sanctioning certain religions. A judge overturned a lower court ruling in favor of Boston.
Ramirez v. Collier
A court ruled 8-1 on March 24 that Texas should grant a death row murderer’s request to have his Christian priest lay hands on him and pray loudly during his execution to strengthen the convicted prisoner’s religion right. A judge has overturned a lower court ruling against John Henry Ramirez, who appealed the state’s denial of contact and prayer requests from his pastor who died from a lethal injection. Ramirez was sentenced to death for the stabbing outside a convenience store in 2004.